Bloomberg) -- U.S. Representative
Barney Frank said it is ``ridiculous'' that bond-rating companies apply tougher standards to local government debt as he prepares to hold a hearing on the soaring interest costs of municipalities.
California Treasurer Bill Lockyer and other state officials are calling for Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service, and Fitch Ratings to change a system they say costs taxpayers by exaggerating the risk that states and cities will default on their debts. Every state except Louisiana would be AAA if measured by the scale used for corporate borrowers, according to research by Moody's Investors Service.
``This notion of having a separate standard for the municipals because they would do too well on the other standard is ridiculous,'' Frank, the Democrat who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, told reporters in Washington yesterday.
Frank's committee today opens a hearing into how states, local governments and other tax-exempt borrowers, which have $2.6 trillion of debt outstanding, are being hurt by the crisis in confidence in U.S. financial markets. The interest costs on auction-rate securities, a type of debt used by municipalities, has almost doubled since January and investors have also demanded higher yields on tax-exempt bonds backed by insurers that are struggling to maintain their own credit ratings.
Insurers' Investments
``The bad investments they have made have dragged down the value of the municipal issuers and cost money for people who want to build schools and roads,'' Frank said in a Bloomberg Television interview today.
Lockyer at today's hearing plans to ask Congress to pressure the rating companies to change their system, spokesman Tom Dresslar said. Other witnesses set to testify include Ajit Jain, the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp., Laura Levenstein, a senior managing director for Moody's, and New York's superintendent of insurance, Eric Dinallo.
``The current system makes no sense,'' said Dresslar. ``Taxpayers wind up paying billions of dollars in higher interest rates and insurance premiums.''
Because ratings are typically lower on the municipal scale, local governments have paid insurance companies to back their bonds with AAA ratings, seeking to reduce borrowers' costs. With insurers' ratings under pressure because of losses on mortgage debts, states, cities and hospitals have faced higher interest costs on floating-rate bonds backed by the guarantors as investors shun the debt.